<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trademark Solution to UDRP Losses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/trademark-solution-to-udrp-losses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/trademark-solution-to-udrp-losses/</link>
	<description>Frank talk by an everyday domainer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:48:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie Aladi</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/trademark-solution-to-udrp-losses/comment-page-1/#comment-3812</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie Aladi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=841#comment-3812</guid>
		<description>Todaro,
&quot;why don’t we get a couple of lawyers who have nothing better to do and sue every company for civil racketeering who tries to take a domain that is not a clear trademark violation.&quot; 
This is what a real domainning community will do. Unfortunately for now it is more like &quot;everyman for himself&quot; while greed, envy and insults are levied on the very few who have the ability to effect any form of change. I have been thinking of a post to that effect but have reneged so far because I do not have enough time to follow the comments I suspect may follow. 
But if domainers spoke as one, if every domainer  will chip in when there is an UNFAIR UDRP, (just the unfair ones) and defend the case, maybe this corporate domain thieves will not be so eager to steal domains. Just maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todaro,<br />
&#8220;why don’t we get a couple of lawyers who have nothing better to do and sue every company for civil racketeering who tries to take a domain that is not a clear trademark violation.&#8221;<br />
This is what a real domainning community will do. Unfortunately for now it is more like &#8220;everyman for himself&#8221; while greed, envy and insults are levied on the very few who have the ability to effect any form of change. I have been thinking of a post to that effect but have reneged so far because I do not have enough time to follow the comments I suspect may follow.<br />
But if domainers spoke as one, if every domainer  will chip in when there is an UNFAIR UDRP, (just the unfair ones) and defend the case, maybe this corporate domain thieves will not be so eager to steal domains. Just maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todaro</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/trademark-solution-to-udrp-losses/comment-page-1/#comment-3811</link>
		<dc:creator>todaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=841#comment-3811</guid>
		<description>see... this is what we need in the domaining industry... people who make sense.  just in the last week i applied for a trademark to protect my most valuable name.  and you gave me a good idea. why don&#039;t we get a couple of lawyers who have nothing better to do and sue every company for civil racketeering who tries to take a domain that is not a clear trademark violation.  i mean by the octopus ruling then livingsocial.com could take social.com for $1500 instead of maybe paying five million for it.  unfairness sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see&#8230; this is what we need in the domaining industry&#8230; people who make sense.  just in the last week i applied for a trademark to protect my most valuable name.  and you gave me a good idea. why don&#8217;t we get a couple of lawyers who have nothing better to do and sue every company for civil racketeering who tries to take a domain that is not a clear trademark violation.  i mean by the octopus ruling then livingsocial.com could take social.com for $1500 instead of maybe paying five million for it.  unfairness sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

