<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Rise and Fall and Rise in Google; a Case Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-rise-and-fall-and-rise-in-google-a-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-rise-and-fall-and-rise-in-google-a-case-study/</link>
	<description>Frank talk by an everyday domainer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:26:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie Aladi</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-rise-and-fall-and-rise-in-google-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie Aladi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=682#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Indeed suited my particular application. I am yet to try beyond but I may some day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed suited my particular application. I am yet to try beyond but I may some day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-rise-and-fall-and-rise-in-google-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=682#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>How come you don&#039;t use beyond dot com?
Is indeed better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come you don&#8217;t use beyond dot com?<br />
Is indeed better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wones</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-rise-and-fall-and-rise-in-google-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>wones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=682#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>Great Article!

PeopleSearches.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article!</p>
<p>PeopleSearches.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-rise-and-fall-and-rise-in-google-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=682#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Thanks! This is very useful information for every seo person/website developer.

-Anil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! This is very useful information for every seo person/website developer.</p>
<p>-Anil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Development</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-rise-and-fall-and-rise-in-google-a-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=682#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>@Frankie

Thanks for your sharing your story.  Another google myth debunked! This is common behavior from google.  They understand that sites go down for one reason or another and don&#039;t penalize you for it.  If the content was ranked in the top 10 once, it makes sense that once google sees it again, it will rank again, too.

We took a site offline for 60 days one time to test this out.  The site was about 2000 pages of content.  We had 100&#039;s of top 10 rankings. Our rank came back in about 2 weeks but the 2000 pages were no longer indexed.  But we submitted a sitemap.xml and got all the pages indexed again.

- Richard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Frankie</p>
<p>Thanks for your sharing your story.  Another google myth debunked! This is common behavior from google.  They understand that sites go down for one reason or another and don&#8217;t penalize you for it.  If the content was ranked in the top 10 once, it makes sense that once google sees it again, it will rank again, too.</p>
<p>We took a site offline for 60 days one time to test this out.  The site was about 2000 pages of content.  We had 100&#8242;s of top 10 rankings. Our rank came back in about 2 weeks but the 2000 pages were no longer indexed.  But we submitted a sitemap.xml and got all the pages indexed again.</p>
<p>- Richard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
