<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Dot US idol is re-branding to Dot Com!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-dot-us-idol-is-rebranding-to-dot-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-dot-us-idol-is-rebranding-to-dot-com/</link>
	<description>Frank talk by an everyday domainer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-dot-us-idol-is-rebranding-to-dot-com/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=596#comment-924</guid>
		<description>These are all nice sites, I too wonder about the re-branding efforts after successfully getting ranked for these .us keyword names. Maybe targeting a global audience or just want it&#039;s unique name? Whatever the situation is, I would have picked better names but at least they have the same suffix. A ballsy move IMHO, keep us updated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all nice sites, I too wonder about the re-branding efforts after successfully getting ranked for these .us keyword names. Maybe targeting a global audience or just want it&#8217;s unique name? Whatever the situation is, I would have picked better names but at least they have the same suffix. A ballsy move IMHO, keep us updated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot us</title>
		<link>http://www.skydomains.com/domain-talk/my-dot-us-idol-is-rebranding-to-dot-com/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skydomains.com/?p=596#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Seem that evn his .com&#039;s forward to the .us,

possibly using both to get more traffic ?

keeping .us as the main url and using the .com to promote it, ths way he sticks, with .us but wont loose traffic to the .com as his rebranding efforts take that into account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seem that evn his .com&#8217;s forward to the .us,</p>
<p>possibly using both to get more traffic ?</p>
<p>keeping .us as the main url and using the .com to promote it, ths way he sticks, with .us but wont loose traffic to the .com as his rebranding efforts take that into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

